In a year there are about 3 E7 seconds, so in these units, we seem small, with

R = E-11 lightyears.

E-11 x 20 x E21 is 2 E10 . Oh shit… I AM SO RATTLED I UNDERFIGURED THIS.

= 2 E11 lyr. Seems the Swiss cheese has more holes, than cheese…. This is a first, pretty dumb estimate. I need galaxy spacing.

= 2 E11 lyr. Seems the Swiss cheese has more holes, than cheese…. This is a first, pretty dumb estimate. I need galaxy spacing.

On this next day, I see I missed a factor of 10 in the Schwarz. radius, and this lowers it, whew !!! Haaaaaaaa, it is still a major development. The added size is roughly equal to all that already is.

Advertisements

E-mail to Burinskii:: It seems to be a Swiss cheese universe.

LikeLike

Is this a simple multiplication of universe radius increase when black hole effects are added volumetrically? In other words, how does extra space created by a stellar black hole in the Milky Way get perceived to an observer in Andromeda whan a black hole forms there?

LikeLike

Andromeda is 2.5 million lightyears distant… You seem to be asking a moot question. One BH is what it is, more of interest closeup. I have summed over very many.

LikeLike

Perhaps putting both the question and the answer into words can be tricky, yet a good verbal description may be helpful for a paper. Are we proposing something new in saying the black hole creates extra space (seen from far away) and does this mean that other particular papers are incorrect? If a single black hole can add radius ‘dr’ to the universe, then the additional volume added is the surface area of the universe times ‘dr’. This seems like a lot of clout for a single black hole?

LikeLike

On the other hand we’ve seen the other references stating what the proper distance is and how the circumference is measured. Are we being consistent with this or do we have a different result?

LikeLike

LOOK at the equation. In the far, we can write S = r + 1/2 log r . Near-field, and far, are defined wrt Schwarz. radius. Careful, this is the calculus form in base ‘e’ !!!

LikeLike

r S S-r

0.3162E+01 0.3738E+01 0.58

0.1000E+02 0.1115E+02 1.15

0.3162E+02 0.3335E+02 1.73

0.1000E+03 0.1023E+03 2.30

0.3162E+03 0.3191E+03 2.88

0.1000E+04 0.1003E+04 3.45

0.3162E+04 0.3166E+04 4.03

0.1000E+05 0.1000E+05 4.61

0.3162E+05 0.3163E+05 5.18

0.1000E+06 0.1000E+06 5.76

0.3162E+06 0.3162E+06 6.33

0.1000E+07 0.1000E+07 6.91

0.3162E+07 0.3162E+07 7.48

0.1000E+08 0.1000E+08 8.06

0.3162E+08 0.3162E+08 8.63

0.1000E+09 0.1000E+09 9.21

0.3162E+09 0.3162E+09 9.79

0.1000E+10 0.1000E+10 10.36

0.3162E+10 0.3162E+10 10.94

0.1000E+11 0.1000E+11 11.51

LikeLike

WHAT ARE YOU DOING ¿¿¿

LikeLike

This is one way to look at the equation. This would be a key step, just in case we’d want to make a graphical plot for the paper.

If I’m not understanding something conceptually that I should be, then I’d invite you to add some thoughts as this type of back and forth is a way to help flesh out the paper.

There shouldn’t be any reason to get frustrated. It simply takes some time and effort to put this all together.

>>It is frustrating for me. From you, I need really only two numbers, yah? The “equation” is simple.

LikeLike

The log of 10, in base ‘e’, is 2.3 . I love my log-log sliderule. Distance to Andromeda measured in our Schwarz. units, is 2.5 million lyr, times E11, the inverse of our unit. We calc for r=2.5E17 , yah?

LikeLike

RADIUS IS RADIUS. Clout, yes !!! CHECK IT OUT, I don’t quite have words yet, but for each BH source, we add the log terms, but not the original statement of ‘r’.

LikeLike

THERE ARE MANY. I have been trying to add up how much more THERE is there, and radially one 3-sun BH gives what I wrote. I need to look back,

LikeLike

Are we able to demonstrate that the circumference of the Earth’s orbit changes if the Sun collapses into a BH? Is this change on the order of r(s)? What is the functional relationship as a function of solar radius during a collapse? This might make an interesting graph.

LikeLike

Who cares, why are you barking at this tree? We don’t have time to waste.

LikeLike

If we can write an equation for this (or other things) with all terms defined it would be possible to tabulate a functional relationship with a short computer program.

LikeLike

I was thinking this helps build contextual understanding and a logical case for the main hypothesis. This applies at least in my mind, though it’s true I’m unsure whether this would be germane for readers of the paper.

LikeLike

I do not follow you. Can’t you get with my program ???

LikeLike