Once a friend with Ph.D. said to me, most of the time I am comfortable with light as a field. Truly, a quantum emission has something like a sin(theta) dependency, and the theory interprets this as, “at such and such an angle, we have  a probability of a photon event”.  Seems to me, absent massive absorbers, no events. Are they not the quantizers ??? QUANTUM FIELD THEORY DOES OFFER a sane physics here, where outside a light-cone of effect, there is yet none. I find this consistent with a blended theory, where absorption events become part of the larger field, as negative emissions, just like in quantum theory.


One thought on “FIELDS and PARTICLES

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s