I spent two years in intellectual darkness, plowing thru chapter 7 in my GR text. It is extremely thick mathematics, yet I wanted to know it. I got thru it and was able to reach out to Alexander Burinskii. Now I go back thru it, and ask, WHAT OF COMPLEXIFICATION??? They spend quite some pages solving the Einstein field equations, given a degenerate form after an Eddington transform. The EFE’s are a set of differential equations, and it seems very convenient in organizing the final 3 into just 2 differential eqs on a complex function. I NEEDED TO KNOW EXACTLY WHAT IS GOING DOWN, RIGHT HERE, and it is cool. my authors are doing a more general functional form of what Kerr did, allowing an imaginary offset of an otherwise “one over ‘r’ ” form. . .

I was entering this arena in 2008, saying in public, we need to complexify GR, clearly, to blend better with quantum field theory. THIS IS SO, but I say DKS is a mistaken effort. Kerr’s first 1963 statement is marvelous.

# DARKNESS… AND LIGHT

Advertisements