You once agreed on my representation of the DKS fields, so I cannot
understand how our differences are so strong.  I construct E-squared
but then multiply by a g^ii  ,   to render an invariant energy
density.   Also one needs to write correctly the d^3V,  in Kerr
FOLKS, seems to me this is correct business in tensor calculus, and the fields yield definite but off-the-wall results. ‘In Kerr coords, the d^3V is  (r^2 + cos^2) sin(theta)  dr d(theta) d(phi).’


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s